You seem to keep straw-manning my argument - again I never proposed that voters aren't entitled to the information contained in the emails. The notion that you

You seem to keep straw-manning my argument - again I never proposed that voters aren't entitled to the information contained in the emails. The notion that you seem to be arguing against is Putin is a skilled propagandist who subtly alters and omits information to further his agenda - again which is solely to weaken the United States. Again, he has a proven track record of doing this. That's why I advocate learning about issues from multiple reputed sources who can vet information and contextualize it, and not take as fact random Wordpress sites set up by Russian intelligence services. Lastly, if you've read my last few replies they are all saying that these are fair tactics, and candidates who can't respond to them probably don't deserve our votes. I'm sorry you took this as meaning I'm pro-Clinton and against everyone else, but I'm usually for people basing their votes and opinions on facts.