6 ms·
And yet, I for one found it very pertinent to HN. After all the discussion as to whether the iPad really is a revolution or not, I personally find this as conv
by demallien 17y ago
And yet, I for one found it very pertinent to HN. After all the discussion as to whether the iPad really is a revolution or not, I personally find this as convincing a demonstration as possible that a very intuitive interface has been created. It's a useful data point to have in mind when discussing iPad ergonomy.
- dschobel 17y agoThat's not the point. The point was that a large number of people thought it not HN worthy. Your individual dissent doesn't matter. Sorry, democracy sucks.
- philwelch 17y agoEvidently, a large number of people thought that little comment of yours wasn't HN worthy, either.
- dschobel 17y agoIf OP and his up-voters think a creature pawing at something is a grand UX insight, more power to them. My only point is that the fact that this has been flagged before puts them in a minority.
- yters 17y agoThe point where all "Not HN!" misanthropes are automatically downvoted probably means HN is jumping the shark.
- jordyhoyt 17y agoI completely fail to see how this is any kind of demonstration that it is an intuitive interface. The cat is pawing at something that is moving and changing, the pawing also happens to generate actions through touch sensors. You could have the most horrendously unintuitive UI possible and this could still be true.