4 ms·
The four month cycle isn't bad unless you are doing anything with JavaScript. There it seems like the four-month cycle slowly begins to pile up, and it makes th
by dvcc 10y ago
The four month cycle isn't bad unless you are doing anything with JavaScript. There it seems like the four-month cycle slowly begins to pile up, and it makes the already impossible task of keeping up with the js-world even harder.
Thinking about it, if it weren't for JavaScript/JSX, I would be perfectly happy with the longer release cycle.
- jongalloway2 10y agoI'm with you there. For JS/JSX dev, I'm assuming you know about Mads Kristensen's Web Extension Pack (https://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/f3b504c6-0095-42f1-a989-51d5fc2a8459 https://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/f3b504c6-0095...) and Node Tools for Visual Studio (https://www.visualstudio.com/vs/node-js/ https://www.visualstudio.com/vs/node-js/), right?
- dvcc 10y agoI was aware of NTVS but not the other, thank you! Although it's still hard to keep getting a full team to keep installing plugins ;).
- wolfgke 10y ago> The four month cycle isn't bad unless you are doing anything with JavaScript. Whether this is an argument against the Visual Studio's or Javascript's cycle is up to the reader to decide. :-)