2 ms·
right, now i'll have to read the article to understand why there is no energy loss :) it does seem to be breaking some rules.. but I guess that's the achieveme
by radarsat1 10y ago
right, now i'll have to read the article to understand why there is no energy loss :)
it does seem to be breaking some rules.. but I guess that's the achievement here. Intuitively there should be some concept of friction/heat loss but maybe on this scale things are different. Maybe it could be exploited as a battery? A way of capturing energy into a stable kinetic "state". (Like a flywheel..)
- ww520 10y agoMoving doesn't implement energy loss automatically. When things are set in motion, they will continue to move infinitely unless interfered by outside forces.
- radarsat1 10y agoRight, but physical movement within a material without loss due to friction implies some kind of mechanical superconductor.. I mean, that's a pretty cool concept.