4 ms·

It would be no different from the story of one venture capital firm marking down the valuation of some other portfolio company. Also King and Zynga have had pe

It would be no different from the story of one venture capital firm marking down the valuation of some other portfolio company. Also King and Zynga have had performance like that. At the end of the day we are just talking about several billion dollars in valuation. The S&P500 returns 1 trillion to shareholders annually. If capital interest in the tech sector is really that fickle, then there's no need to kick the can. San Francisco is begging to return to the "good ole' days" where there was no industry Sounds like a net positive

leereeves 10y ago
Twitter seems like a particularly high profile stock, one of the few known to people who don't play with the latest apps and sites. Who ever mentioned King or Zynga on a TV show or newspaper?
- dragonwriter 10y ago
  > Twitter seems like a particularly high profile stock, one of the few known to people who don't play with the latest apps and sites. > Who ever mentioned King or Zynga on a TV show or newspaper? Judging from Google News (and just picking 2009 for this exercise), lots of people wrote about Zynga in newspapers (especially the NY Times and USA Today.)
- cloudjacker 10y ago
  If it turns out that a 17 billion dollar company is the pinnacle of irrational exuberance, when it remains a successful company at 3 billion dollars - for example - then the capital enthusiasm for "tech 2.0" was never really there. A reality though is that 17 billion is a drop in the bucket in US equities and you are overestimating the relevance of Twitter's market cap problems.
  - leereeves 10y ago
    I don't mean "irrational exuberance", I mean irrational pricing. If Twitter is overvalued by 10x, some models for valuing established tech companies are way off.
    - cloudjacker 10y ago
      well if they had figured it out, the road to 100 million market cap would be a quick one. Just competing views on speculation getting the existing market premium.

leereeves 10y ago

Twitter seems like a particularly high profile stock, one of the few known to people who don't play with the latest apps and sites. Who ever mentioned King or Zynga on a TV show or newspaper?

dragonwriter 10y ago
> Twitter seems like a particularly high profile stock, one of the few known to people who don't play with the latest apps and sites. > Who ever mentioned King or Zynga on a TV show or newspaper? Judging from Google News (and just picking 2009 for this exercise), lots of people wrote about Zynga in newspapers (especially the NY Times and USA Today.)
cloudjacker 10y ago
If it turns out that a 17 billion dollar company is the pinnacle of irrational exuberance, when it remains a successful company at 3 billion dollars - for example - then the capital enthusiasm for "tech 2.0" was never really there. A reality though is that 17 billion is a drop in the bucket in US equities and you are overestimating the relevance of Twitter's market cap problems.
- leereeves 10y ago
  I don't mean "irrational exuberance", I mean irrational pricing. If Twitter is overvalued by 10x, some models for valuing established tech companies are way off.
  - cloudjacker 10y ago
    well if they had figured it out, the road to 100 million market cap would be a quick one. Just competing views on speculation getting the existing market premium.