2 ms·

You seem to think I am invested in Sanders, which I can tell you is not true. Heck, I can't even vote. You go on your elaborate rant about how the system has al

You seem to think I am invested in Sanders, which I can tell you is not true. Heck, I can't even vote. You go on your elaborate rant about how the system has always been unfair and Clintons are brilliant to utilize it in their favor and nobody should complain about it, yet you fail to feel the same way about Trump or Putin. Propaganda has always been used and misinformation has been used to influence large groups of people to do stupid stuff. If the large group decides to buy into the propaganda and elect Trump, why are you complaining? I am digressing here from my original point that people are too focussed about the source and not enough about the contents and its validity, but going by what you've already said, you seem to be ok with everything being wrong as long as it favors Clintons. I am done discussing this.

travmatt 10y ago
You seem to keep straw-manning my argument - again I never proposed that voters aren't entitled to the information contained in the emails. The notion that you seem to be arguing against is Putin is a skilled propagandist who subtly alters and omits information to further his agenda - again which is solely to weaken the United States. Again, he has a proven track record of doing this. That's why I advocate learning about issues from multiple reputed sources who can vet information and contextualize it, and not take as fact random Wordpress sites set up by Russian intelligence services. Lastly, if you've read my last few replies they are all saying that these are fair tactics, and candidates who can't respond to them probably don't deserve our votes. I'm sorry you took this as meaning I'm pro-Clinton and against everyone else, but I'm usually for people basing their votes and opinions on facts.