4 ms·
I'd argue that curiosity that leads to science predates all religion and is built into our dna via evolution. I think projecting cultural motivators for natural
by drzaiusapelord 10y ago
I'd argue that curiosity that leads to science predates all religion and is built into our dna via evolution. I think projecting cultural motivators for natural motivation is questionable. In another culture you'd say Islam was a motivator for science and you'd be just as wrong. The evidence we have shows that this is a natural part of being human and would come about in any culture- and has! Our most innovating culture, the ancient Greeks, were pagans with relatively low levels of religiosity for example. Religious belief really has no bearing on curiosity and innovation but theocratic structures can, and do, hold back progress.
> knowledge that because the universe is created with a purpose, you can be confident that you will be able to find answers
Except the deeper we go down the more complex and chaotic things seem. The simplistic Newtonian age and doctors who just had to "rebalance" humors are long dead. I think your assumption here is fairly bewildering.
>they had no choice but to pretend to be Catholic back then!
Just because it bothers you doesn't make it any less true. Historically, most people didn't have a choice in religion. Apostasy was a serious crime in Christian soceities up until recently and still is in many parts of the middle east.
- nsxwolf 10y agoIslam at times has been a motivator for science and other intellectual endeavors. I don't need to be from another culture to say that, and I'm not wrong. What actually bothers me is that what I said was true, yet some people are unwilling to take even a superficial look at the evidence.