3 ms·
We wrote a post about this recently[1]. It really depends on how you want to use them, but here are three things that might not be obvious about Projects on fi
by kareemm 10y ago
We wrote a post about this recently[1]. It really depends on how you want to use them, but here are three things that might not be obvious about Projects on first glance:
* GH Projects exist within a repo, so you can only have Issues from a single repo on a Project.
* A Project contains a subset of issues within a repo - they need to be added manually to the project. This would make it tough to manage a whole project with a Project because you'd have to manually add any issue you created to it.
* You can't filter issues in a Project. Fundamentally a Project is not driven by a query, it's driven by manually adding issues to a Project. So slicing and dicing issues on a Project isn't possible.
I think GH Projects could be used to manage the release of an Epic (e.g. a subset of issues grouped together within a repo). But I think it'd be challenging to manage an entire project with one.
1 - http://blog.codetree.com/articles/the-important-differences-between-github-projects-and-codetree.html http://blog.codetree.com/articles/the-important-differences-...
- cphoover 10y agoWhat's your status on integrating with other platforms? any plans for integration with other platforms in the future (gitlab, gogs, other platforms...)
- kareemm 10y agoIntegrations with other platforms are on our list, but right now we're focused on improving the product for existing GitHub customers. The GitHub market is so large that to split our focus right now wouldn't make sense.