4 ms·

You will tell these people in free countries what they want; they aren't permitted to decide from themselves. If they desire otherwise they must have been force

You will tell these people in free countries what they want; they aren't permitted to decide from themselves. If they desire otherwise they must have been forced, and if not that then they must have a psychological condition. What other explanation could there be for doing something you disagree with? What's the point of freedom if it only applies to things you support? There is no factual basis. There is no presumption of innocence, due process; it's just your suspicions and speculation.

Chris2048 10y ago
> You will tell these people in free countries what they want Yes, you will want freedom and liberty, no choice there; when did 'free country' mean otherwise? A "free country" allows people to be free; when people enter that society still bearing the shackles of their non-free origins they are not yet free. > If they desire otherwise they must have been forced must? I didn't say this, I said 'some'. If you want to talk about the issue don't misrepresent my words. > What's the point of freedom if it only applies to things you support? When you say you are you talking about me or society? Again, total tolerance will tolerate intolerance. A free society still has rules and enforced motives. The difference is freedom is the goal, not religiously-defined piety. > There is no factual basis. There is no presumption of innocence, due process; it's just your suspicions and speculation. What statement(s) are you referring to here? factual basis for which claim?