Why do you believe that child porn should be given a legal carve-out? Once the system to scan is in place, it matters not what's actually being scanned. And th

Why do you believe that child porn should be given a legal carve-out? Once the system to scan is in place, it matters not what's actually being scanned. And there's the fact that CP is strict statutory. Meaning, I can get your email, and send you via a remixing network, a few dozen CP images. And you're now guilty. If anything, adding in mens rea requirement would be the best choice. Or remove it as law, because it's evidence of a crime. And the FBI does it, why can't I? /anger