4 ms·
I disagree. But then again, I want a good version of Unix, and not a free competitor to Windows.
by Esau 10y ago
I disagree. But then again, I want a good version of Unix, and not a free competitor to Windows.
- baldfat 10y agoEverything you said was emotional thinking.
- pjc50 10y agoSo? All statements of the form "I want .. " are emotional. It's the only sensible way to reason about what you want. There's no "rational" set of preferences that people are obliged to have.
- baldfat 10y agoI want a rational technology based reason why systemd has caused Linux harm. That is not emotional that is a state request from fact based statement.
- parrellel 10y agoIt is unfortunately a political problem being actively prosecuted with technology. Red Hat would like SystemD to be the init system of record and have - for years now - been subsuming other utilities, daemons, logging, su, etc. in order to make it the obligate choice. Any technical gains from the integrations seem secondary to the control this gives them over the direction of Linux as a whole. This is obvious dirty pool. If they'd gotten where they were on the merits, I think people would be a lot quieter. Beyond the political stupidity, systemd has made itself a single massive and opaque point of failure, especially since it ate logging.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]