I find this interesting. I have a few nitpicks for everyone's consideration. >* The source code is more than 100 MB. Excluding images, example usage, and gene

I find this interesting. I have a few nitpicks for everyone's consideration. >* The source code is more than 100 MB. Excluding images, example usage, and generated documentation, sure. >* Your code tries to install into /opt or /usr/local [ +10 points of FAIL ] Installing to /usr/local is the accepted default for linux. Plus, I actually use the package manager on my system. I want compiled software to install to /opt or /usr/local so I can find it later and remove it if necessary. Now trying to install to /opt on windows is just stupid. >* Your code does not have per-file licensing [ +10 points of FAIL ] This is pedantic. If the entire codebase is under the same license which is given as LICENSE in the program's folder you're good. (You should make it clear in README that LICENSE does apply to the entire project.) If not, any inconsistent licensing should be explicitly defined either in a visible top level document next to LICENSE which lists each exception clearly (e.g. stuff in multiverse/ is proprietary, see multiverse/<project>/LICENSE for details) or at the top of each file that doesn't match the license in LICENSE.