3 ms·
Yes. That would be a start. The downvotes are comical. Never seen so much sympathy for people who defraud investors and put healthcare at risk.
by lint_roller 10y ago
Yes. That would be a start.
The downvotes are comical. Never seen so much sympathy for people who defraud investors and put healthcare at risk.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- dang 10y agoOne needn't sympathize with those things to downvote unsubstantive snark on HN. We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12649468 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12649468 and marked it off-topic.
- lint_roller 10y agoSnark begets snark, dang. I didn't perceive the parent comment to be particularly substantive either. We'll agree to disagree. Voters seemed to agree with my sentiment after all.
- dang 10y agoVoters upvote snark routinely. That's a weakness of the voting system, not a sign of quality. HN can't live by upvotes alone.