I followed your link, but it does not support your summary. It is arguing about one specific point (the 60% point) with no discussion on where people actually a

I followed your link, but it does not support your summary. It is arguing about one specific point (the 60% point) with no discussion on where people actually are. For instance, the 1/3 "poor" in the US could earn 1$/year and it would not invalidate the discussion, but it would clearly invalidate your summary (and the title of the blog post).