I don't oppose subsides, per se; I oppose the involuntary collection of tax money, or any involuntary transfer of property. If for example, a subway is inheren

I don't oppose subsides, per se; I oppose the involuntary collection of tax money, or any involuntary transfer of property. If for example, a subway is inherently more efficient than other means of travel, and it can be funded via ticket sales, I am SO for it. If it can't survive or exist without the involuntary collection of property, then I oppose it. And infrastructure has been a major role for governments for quite some time, and I completely agree it's a legitimate role. However, it should be based on usage fees.