Some cities charge taxes based on the number of feet of street connected to someone's yard. It seems perfectly logical that in such a city, the "right" to park

Some cities charge taxes based on the number of feet of street connected to someone's yard. It seems perfectly logical that in such a city, the "right" to park should be greatest at one's own house, and fade with distance. So anyone from an apartment complex outside the neighborhood is an outsider, and should have less claim to the spot in front of a house than the house's owner. I also find it bizarre that some HN users (not you obviously since you can't downvote a direct reply) frequently downvote comments that provide a differing perspective from the anti-suburban anti-car view.