2 ms·
Not that I agree, but they are trying to keep the "bad guys" thinking certain forms of communication are safe when really they are listening. I see the logic,
by lettergram 10y ago
Not that I agree, but they are trying to keep the "bad guys" thinking certain forms of communication are safe when really they are listening.
I see the logic, hide our capabilities (kind of like the star wars program) and then no one knows what's safe.
- jdavis703 10y agoThat also keeps the "good guys" thinking they're safe, when in fact there could be a backdoor for the Chinese government that sends over all messages that say "falun gong." As demonstrated by the recent leak at the NSA perhaps we should be investing in as much cyber defense as offense before a cyber terrorist attack occurs.
- FullMtlAlcoholc 10y agoFrom everything I've learned about security, offense is much, much more effective dollar for dollar and that any concerted effort of creating an impenetrable shield would result in a cyber Maginot Line. An all out cyber war would be scary as there isn't any procedure or policy for descalation once started, no white flag. What's especially scary is that the government wastes all this time and money surveillaning people's online habits when the electric grid, probably the number one target in the event of a cyber war, is so defenseless that a squirrel can effectively take out electricity for the Eastern seaboard.