4 ms·

Thanks for your comment! We understand the commitment a user makes when switching planning/collaboration app. We are in this for the long run and already have

• brudgers 10y ago
  I'm no less concerned because: 1. The basis for pricing is cost to produce rather than value produced. 2. The anchor price for the enterprise product is the low price of the cloud product. 3. Suppose the tag line for your product was "It returns 50x its cost every month!" At 100 euro per ten seats that's 500 euro per seat per month before switching costs and administrative costs. In many businesses 500 euro per employee per month is line noise and 5000 euro in a department is rounding error. At 100 euro a seat, the numbers are more likely to be meaningful. 4. Adding analytics across teams isn't going to be a 90 euro add on to a 10 euro product. But it's a version 1.1 feature for a 100 euro product. 5. The amount of value that it is possible to create with the revenue from a 100 euro seat can potentially be leveraged into a 200 euro seat. Getting from 10 euro seats to 50 euro seats is likely to be harder. 6. The argument for lower prices is not backed up with a model higher showing higher revenue.