> Was the argument by the bankers basically a complaint that retooling would be very expensive? Yes. Everyone else should be more vulnerable to MitM attacks a

> Was the argument by the bankers basically a complaint that retooling would be very expensive? Yes. Everyone else should be more vulnerable to MitM attacks and insecurities, because it's too expensive for them to fix their endpoints. I don't care. Security protocols are hard enough to design correctly, without adding crap like that. And, I don't care enough about their crappy business model to support it by giving up some of my security. It's 2016, people. Grow up, or get out.