5 ms·
Don't want to be accused of being a shill (I'm not, I'm just a fan), but if you're looking for potential alternatives to RethinkDB, Couchbase (the company that
by PaulCapestany 10y ago
Don't want to be accused of being a shill (I'm not, I'm just a fan), but if you're looking for potential alternatives to RethinkDB, Couchbase (the company that was formed when the MemcacheD and CouchDB folks joined forces) offer a totally open source realtime-sync API/SDK (cross-platform: mobile, web, you name it).
Link: http://www.couchbase.com/nosql-databases/couchbase-mobile http://www.couchbase.com/nosql-databases/couchbase-mobile
- robertjpayne 10y agoCouchbase is a very very different product under the hood. Be aware you have to run Couchbase with their minimum spec cluster requirements ( 3 nodes, tons of CPU and RAM ) just to ensure you don't lose data because it syncs from ram to disk at best every 100ms
- HodGreeley 10y agoHod @ Couchbase here. This is inaccurate. Couchbase does not delay in writing to disk (some other dbs do). You typically want 3 nodes for high availability and failover, but it isn't required. Auto replication can also help avoid loss in many failure scenarios.
- robertjpayne 10y agoI'd actually love to be proven wrong, Couchbase looks awesome on paper but some Couchbase staff even confirmed this with me here https://forums.couchbase.com/t/persistence-durability-guarentees/9860/7 https://forums.couchbase.com/t/persistence-durability-guaren...
- HodGreeley 10y agoThis is complicated, because you're intertwining Sync Gateway and Couchbase Server. Couchbase Server queues writes immediately. The default is to ack once a write is in Server memory, but you can choose other options. See the response from daschl in that thread. I see what you were trying to get at with your question. I'm not sure we clarified enough what's going on. I'll respond on the forum.
- evanelias 10y agoEhh, on the Memcached side it was a few contributors (including two major ones, iirc). They're great engineers, but I don't think it's accurate to call them "the Memcached folks". As far as I know, Memcached's longtime maintainer / primary contributor (dormando) is not involved with Couchbase, and neither is Memcached's original creator (bradfitz).
- tleyden5iwx 10y agoIt's more like "one of the memcached contributors", rather than "all the memcached folks". Couchbase was a merger between NorthScale and CouchOne. The CouchOne founding team were all CouchdDB project founders: Damien Katz, J Chris Anderson, and Jan Lehnardt. NorthScale was founded by Steve Yen, who was an Entrepreneur in Residence at Accel, and Dustin Sallings, who was a committer on the Memcached project. The first product that NorthScale released was called Membase, and the point of it was to help companies run large memcached clusters without having to think very hard. Couchbase later evolved into a hybrid of Membase and CouchDB that can speak the memcached protocol but also has some of the JSON document database properties that CouchDB has.
- ingenthr 10y agoTrond Norbye and I were also pretty involved with the memcached project, both joined NorthScale and we're both still part of Couchbase. Trond in particular did a lot of work on the server and I did a lot of work with the java client and helping people. Steve Yen was doing a lot and fixing bugs and wrote moxi, a memcached proxy that was very useful in the early days. With the CouchOne merger, we moved a lot of the proxy topology independence into clients and added a lot more.
- tepidandroid 10y agoThe deal-breaker for me with couchbase is that the community edition lags (in terms of bug fixes, security updates, etc) 8-10 months behind their commercially licensed offering.
- arungupta 10y agoDevelopers do have early access to the latest Couchbase EE versions for development and testing as long as they are not using it in production. If they are using Couchbase in production and they do not want to pay for EE, then they do have to live with the CE lags. This allows us to maintain a sustainable business model.
- arungupta 10y agoSome more points ... 1 - Unabashedly, our #1 commitment is to our customers who are relying on Couchbase for their mission critical applications. That's why the Couchbase Enterprise Edition gets the bulk of our attention and testing. 2 - History can show that's it's actually more like 3-6 months of delay rather that 8-10 and corresponds more to our release cycles than to an artificially imposed delay. 3 - Couchbase CE is provided as a service to the community. Users who want to rely upon their own expertise to run a database in production have a responsibility to themselves and their organization to have the appropriate level of skills to do so. That should mean being able to debug and fix bugs themselves. In fact, our open source code base does not lag AT ALL and anyone is welcome to build off of that themselves and get all of the latest and greatest features (and bugs of course). If they're not willing to do this, they should be paying us to.
- arun_couch 10y agoArun from Couchbase, few points ... 1 - Unabashedly, our #1 commitment is to our customers who are relying on Couchbase for their mission critical applications. That's why the Couchbase Enterprise Edition gets the bulk of our attention and testing. 2 - History can show that's it's actually more like 3-6 months of delay rather that 8-10 and corresponds more to our release cycles than to an artificially imposed delay. 3 - Couchbase major releases has always had CE and EE in sync. 4 - Couchbase CE is provided as a service to the community. Users who want to rely upon their own expertise to run a database in production have a responsibility to themselves and their organization to have the appropriate level of skills to do so. That should mean being able to debug and fix bugs themselves. In fact, our open source code base does not lag AT ALL and anyone is welcome to build off of that themselves and get all of the latest and greatest features (and bugs of course). If they're not willing to do this, they should be paying us to.