3 ms·
>And Rust won't work there for a while at least. Yes, and that is why those industries will choose to ignore it for a while at least. Chicken and egg.
by S_I 10y ago
>And Rust won't work there for a while at least.
Yes, and that is why those industries will choose to ignore it for a while at least.
Chicken and egg.
- Manishearth 10y agoIt's not a chicken and egg. Like I said, the Rust team does want to make this happen (and is already doing so from the specification side, though I suspect multiple implementations will come from elsewhere since we already have a couple partial ones). Rust already has lots of folks from other industries trying to use it -- there's plenty of momentum for it to get there. It will take time, but it's not like Rust will never get there without support from the industries you mention (which would be a chicken and egg problem)
- S_I 10y agoUntil this happens i will remain skeptical if the Rust community can pull it off without the backing of said industries. On the other i like being proven wrong. Time will tell. > though I suspect multiple implementations will come from elsewhere since we already have a couple partial ones) >Rust already has lots of folks from other industries trying to use it I'm not up to date. Input would be appreciated here.
- Manishearth 10y agoAs for alternate implementations, https://github.com/thepowersgang/mrustc https://github.com/thepowersgang/mrustc . As for specification, https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1643 https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1643 is what's currently happening, i.e. specifying exactly how unsafe code behaves (this is more important than specifying the rest). But the rest will come. As for the industry, https://www.rust-lang.org/friends.html https://www.rust-lang.org/friends.html
- S_I 10y agoThanks.