4 ms·
I have not specifically studied the policies stated in this piece to be 80 years old and credited to Herbert Hoover's administration, but those policies should
by Mz 10y ago
I have not specifically studied the policies stated in this piece to be 80 years old and credited to Herbert Hoover's administration, but those policies should date to the 1930's and the Great Depression. I know that one of the things they did during The Great Depression was just tried stuff, often crazy sounding stuff, and hoped something worked because things were so desperate. A lot of counterintuitive things did help, thus they stuck around. No one has really studied if some of those things were a good idea in that specific time and place versus were a good idea generally.
I have studied housing history in th US dating to about WW2. I have written a number of long comments in various places on the internet and injected a bit of that into some blog posts. I get tired of repeating myself (and being mostly ignored), but the nutshell version is that poor people went to war, savings rates during the war were as high as 50% for some parts of the war, and the soldiers came home with money in the bank and military benefits that helped them buy houses and go to college. So there was enormous and unprecedented housing demand and the nation as a whole rose up to meet it at impressive speed. The demand was for family detached homes and it gave birth to the modern suburb. Since then, our demographic has differentiated while our housing policies, ideals, and financing mechanisms have converged on this one standard that served the nuclear family well but does not serve our current population well.
- ajmurmann 10y agoThank you for the explanation! Do you also have any insights into the US obsession with keeping different usage types separated in addition to low density? I just don't understand how anyone could see it as a bad thing to be able to walk to a cafe or small grocer. That and low density doesn't seem obviously mutually exclusive.
- Mz 10y agoOff the top of my head: If you look at studies of sense of personal space, Americans and criminals generally claim more space as "theirs" than most people. So, we may like our homes to be away from other things because we get cranky and aggressive when anyone gets in our space. I live without a car. I am still trying to figure out how to reconcile having stuff in walking distance with wanting to be left the hell alone. The result: My walking stamina has steadily increased since I got rid of my car. So the definition of "walking distance" has changed in my mind.