3 ms·
I never said they were or were not. But that only sets the tone and the coverage. Emails/Benghazi/Clinton Foundation got plenty of coverage by the "liberal" med
by rm_-rf_slash 10y ago
I never said they were or were not. But that only sets the tone and the coverage. Emails/Benghazi/Clinton Foundation got plenty of coverage by the "liberal" media. The facts were found, and they moved on.
What's the old saying, facts have a liberal bias?
- nibs 10y agoHow well would you say modern "liberals" handle facts in the domains of: - IQ testing - Evolutionary psychology - GMOs - Child development - Economics
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- Stanish 10y agoI encourage you to watch this panel (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsgapaYCs40 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsgapaYCs40) and then say that "the facts are found". They have been stonewalling all fact-finding from the start, and anyone paying attention to the actual facts can see a seriously egregious pattern of corruption and cover-up on multiple levels. I'm not a Trump supporter, either, but I am baffled by how ignorant some Democrats have become to this stuff given the relative cynicism and insight that prevailed during the Bush years, especially concerning Iraq. She acts a lot like Bush and we can expect a very similar administration from her. It's sickening, honestly, as people will die and suffer for our ignorance.