> "Why is it considered progress to go back to how urban life was several centuries ago?" Just because something is newer doesn't mean it is automatically bett

> "Why is it considered progress to go back to how urban life was several centuries ago?" Just because something is newer doesn't mean it is automatically better. Regression is just as possible as progression. There's a difference in quality of life between human-focused cities and transport-focused cities. People who have experienced both tend to prefer the former. Why do you think that is?