4 ms·
My proposed solution: If it ain't broke...
by erlanger 17y ago
My proposed solution: If it ain't broke...
- portman 17y agoEven better, but there seems to be tons of enthusiasm on the Chromium team for removing http. I'm just hoping they minimize the collateral damage.
- erlanger 17y agoReminds me of another dominant tech company with a history of thinking it knows better than its users and making awful UI decisions.
- rcfox 17y agoCanonical?
- lurkerperpetual 17y agocontroversial != awful
- Naga 17y agoSometimes doing things like that work, re: floppy drives and the iMac.
- Groxx 17y agoI'm sure the same thing was said about inner-tube tires. I mean, why re-invent the wheel?
- hartror 17y agoBecause have you ever ridden a bicycle with a flat tire? I hardly think the two use cases compare. Anyway Comment #24 makes a lot of sense http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=40865#c24 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=40865#c24 I see the enhancement for the end users who have NFI what http is but leaving it there provides more advantages as a whole than removing it.
- alexyim 17y agoThat's a saying that works only when things fail. But if you applied it to everything all the time, then no progress will be made.