3 ms·

You're dodging the issue. Assuming the officer is guilty outright, seem dangerous honestly.

• beachstartup 10y ago
  haha dude. he's taking the position because it's extreme. it's called moving the overton window. political talk taken at face value is almost worthless. you can't literally argue with people like this on the internet.
• Aaargh20318 10y ago
  Why would it be dangerous ? As I said, that officer needs to account for all his actions during working hours anyway, so there should never be a problem proving his/her innocence. Or to put it another way: if an officer has, say an hour, on a working day in which (s)he can't account for his/her whereabouts and actions, wouldn't that be a good reason to suspect and investigate that officer ? What was he/she doing in that time, why did he/she feel the need to drop 'off the grid' for an hour ? If they have nothing to hide, then why would it be a problem ?