3 ms·
> What's even neater about AI is that the requirements to get involved are much lower than that of hardware and much easier to propagate. That's thinking very
by veddox 10y ago
> What's even neater about AI is that the requirements to get involved are much lower than that of hardware and much easier to propagate.
That's thinking very much from a CS point of view. Sure, if we're only talking about software you're quite right. But I would strongly argue that if we want to build an artificial intelligence, we first need to know what a "natural" intelligence looks like - and that includes a lot of neurobiological research that still needs doing. Now you can say what you like about software, but neuroscience doesn't come that cheap...
- codyb 10y agoI'm not sure why A.I. would need to be based on human intelligence. At the end of the day the black box of the process doesn't matter if the results are sound, and we already frequently don't understand how our current A.I. works (which features the system is picking up on, etc). I'd expect that trend to continue.