I followed exactly the same line of reasoning except that I did swerve to save people crossing on a green light at the expense of people on a red light. The re

I followed exactly the same line of reasoning except that I did swerve to save people crossing on a green light at the expense of people on a red light. The reasoning being something like: "The passenger of the car should absorb the risk of a car failure, not pedestrians. In the case pedestrians must die, protect those who follow the rules if possible." Incidentally my answers meant I always killed women instead of men...