5 ms·

The situation is somewhat similar, but with some key differences: - the PC/Mac market has Microsoft taking a cut of every PC sold. Not so with Google's Android

by andreyf 17y ago

The situation is somewhat similar, but with some key differences: - the PC/Mac market has Microsoft taking a cut of every PC sold. Not so with Google's Android. With minimal software costs, making Android handsets is dirt cheaper. - in the PC/Mac market, Apple makes most of their money selling hardware. In the mobile market, Apple is also making money facilitating the sale of content (Movies, Music, Apps). - currently, Apple has an enormous advantage in the number of developers targeting their platform. As the industry matures, developers will gravitate even more to the device where they can make money selling their apps. When people start realizing how to easily pirate Android apps, I predict Apple will be the clear winner here.

bad_user 17y ago
> When people start realizing how to easily pirate their Android apps, I predict Apple will be the clear winner here. You could've said the same thing about Windows apps. Piracy (which always acted as a marketing scheme for software) is also becoming irrelevant since many apps on the iPhone are just frontends to online services. Besides, the free lunch is almost over. People are getting tired of fart apps.
- colinplamondon 17y ago
  You could have said the same about barely wired desktop PC app piracy in 1991 as ubiquitously connected mobile device app piracy in the year 2010?
  - bad_user 17y ago
    I was thinking more about '95 when Win95 was released, but yeah. Back then I had a PC with dozens of pirated apps and games (there were "pirates" which took orders by phone, and delivered CDs by mail). In fact I haven't used so much pirated software as in the nineties :)
    - jarek 17y ago
      When I was younger and in a different legal jurisdiction, pirates would deliver the CDs to your house. Price was comparable with a pizza order, too.
- thejake 17y ago
  > People are getting tired of fart apps. Sir! Bite your tongue! This truly unique genere of iPhone apps has incalculable (by you, at least) amounts of potential. I'm certain that you would be shocked at the extensive research and development that is going into the next generation of these apps.
- andreyf 17y ago
  Besides, the free lunch is almost over. People are getting tired of fart apps. Fart apps never made Apple much money. Of the top 5 grossing apps on the iPhone right now, the prices are $15, free, $1, $900, $7. They are hardly "fart apps". The free one is a TV streamer with an in-app subscription service of $10/month. The $1 is the RedLaser barcode scanner. Of the top 50 apps, 11 cost <$1, and 12 cost >$10 [1]. Apple is actively pushing developers to make more of the latter. 1. I mean >= and <=, rounded to the nearest dollar. That is, $9.99 ~ $10.
- allyt 17y ago
  >> When people start realizing how to easily pirate their Android apps, I predict Apple will be the clear winner here. > You could've said the same thing about Windows apps. Precisely! Except the easier it is to pirate Windows software, the more valuable Windows becomes (at no loss to Microsoft). Handset manufacturers, on the other hand, are trying to make a profit by taking a cut of the app sales. The more iPhone apps are sold, the more money Apple makes. Their bottom line is negatively affected every time someone opts to pirate instead of buying. Not so with Microsoft.

by andreyf 17y ago

bad_user 17y ago

> When people start realizing how to easily pirate their Android apps, I predict Apple will be the clear winner here. You could've said the same thing about Windows apps. Piracy (which always acted as a marketing scheme for software) is also becoming irrelevant since many apps on the iPhone are just frontends to online services. Besides, the free lunch is almost over. People are getting tired of fart apps.

colinplamondon 17y ago
You could have said the same about barely wired desktop PC app piracy in 1991 as ubiquitously connected mobile device app piracy in the year 2010?
- bad_user 17y ago
  I was thinking more about '95 when Win95 was released, but yeah. Back then I had a PC with dozens of pirated apps and games (there were "pirates" which took orders by phone, and delivered CDs by mail). In fact I haven't used so much pirated software as in the nineties :)
  - jarek 17y ago
    When I was younger and in a different legal jurisdiction, pirates would deliver the CDs to your house. Price was comparable with a pizza order, too.
thejake 17y ago
> People are getting tired of fart apps. Sir! Bite your tongue! This truly unique genere of iPhone apps has incalculable (by you, at least) amounts of potential. I'm certain that you would be shocked at the extensive research and development that is going into the next generation of these apps.
andreyf 17y ago
Besides, the free lunch is almost over. People are getting tired of fart apps. Fart apps never made Apple much money. Of the top 5 grossing apps on the iPhone right now, the prices are $15, free, $1, $900, $7. They are hardly "fart apps". The free one is a TV streamer with an in-app subscription service of $10/month. The $1 is the RedLaser barcode scanner. Of the top 50 apps, 11 cost <$1, and 12 cost >$10 [1]. Apple is actively pushing developers to make more of the latter. 1. I mean >= and <=, rounded to the nearest dollar. That is, $9.99 ~ $10.
allyt 17y ago
>> When people start realizing how to easily pirate their Android apps, I predict Apple will be the clear winner here. > You could've said the same thing about Windows apps. Precisely! Except the easier it is to pirate Windows software, the more valuable Windows becomes (at no loss to Microsoft). Handset manufacturers, on the other hand, are trying to make a profit by taking a cut of the app sales. The more iPhone apps are sold, the more money Apple makes. Their bottom line is negatively affected every time someone opts to pirate instead of buying. Not so with Microsoft.