3 ms·
If you are sick of javascript on the front end, but don't want to give up the fancy-pants UI, you could do worse than my library, intercooler, which lets you ad
by carsongross 10y ago
If you are sick of javascript on the front end, but don't want to give up the fancy-pants UI, you could do worse than my library, intercooler, which lets you add AJAX to your app with a few HTML attributes.
http://intercoolerjs.org http://intercoolerjs.org
Make REST work the way it was intended, supports CSS transitions, request indicators, etc.
Good little library that eliminates a lot of complexity for web apps that don't need all this junk (most of them.)
- commentzorro 10y agoJust saw intercooler referenced in a post a couple days ago and took a look. It does look refreshingly simple to get started. I've got a basic app with JSON end points already created. I was going to give VUE a go but after looking at intercooler I'm going to create an alternate set of /IC/* URLS and send out HTML instead. I'll soon see how it works for this task.
- carsongross 10y agoI'd love to hear what your experience is. Thanks for giving it a try!
- qohen 10y agoJust saw intercooler referenced in a post a couple days ago and took a look. It does look refreshingly simple to get started. Aaaaaand...we've come full-circle now: Intercooler depends on JQuery, version 1.10.0 or higher. :-)
- commentzorro 10y ago>Intercooler depends on JQuery, version 1.10.0 or higher. I don't have any real problems with jQuery being in the mix for intercooler. Even with that, jQuery appears to be an underlying library used for convenience rather than a library an intercooler coder would have to know and code against. I do appreciate the irony when taken in context with the original article though.