4 ms·
It sounds to me like it's a great framework, but "Angular 2" is a misnomer at this point. Maybe the "Angular" name will entice 1.x users to it, but it seems lik
by _greim_ 10y ago
It sounds to me like it's a great framework, but "Angular 2" is a misnomer at this point. Maybe the "Angular" name will entice 1.x users to it, but it seems like the Angular team could have created "MasterBlaster 1.0, the successor to Angular" or something, still got some hype, and avoided a lot of grumpiness.
- jbigelow76 10y agoMy vote was for "Angular Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho" but the Angular team was already pretty committed to Angular 2 by then.