5 ms·
Pretty soon, we'll just use XKCD numbers and not bother linking. We'll just call something or other "hey, that's a 927"
by DigitalJack 10y ago
Pretty soon, we'll just use XKCD numbers and not bother linking. We'll just call something or other "hey, that's a 927"
- Sophistifunk 10y agoWe should create a URI standard for that; xkcd://927
- rndgermandude 10y agoLet me propose the xkcd2 scheme, to be used like xkcd2:927, because who really needs those two slashes?!
- tychuz 10y agoMy proposal: xkcd3, works as xkcd3:927 AND xkcd3://927 And that's why Linux desktop is going nowhere.
- jepler 10y agohi, what about xkcd4:ⅽⅿⅹⅹⅶⅹ or xkcd5:٩٢٧ (note: may not appear in correct reading order due to technical limitations)
- Razengan 10y agoI propose a browser powered by deep machine learning that lets you just write 927 and automatically figures out that it refers to an XKCD by inferring the context from looking at the content on the rest of the page.
- chungy 10y agoShould be simple enough: https://github.com/chungy/xkcd-uri https://github.com/chungy/xkcd-uri
- ChoHag 10y ago> Just made for fun, not expected to see any wide use. Well that's jinxed it.
- sdrothrock 10y agoEchoes of "Shaka, when the walls fell."