4 ms·
Reading elsewhere, it sounds possible that more attention for `ggvis` is on the menu once `ggplot2` is in a more complete form, so I'd hoped that `ggplot2` woul
by rz2k 10y ago
Reading elsewhere, it sounds possible that more attention for `ggvis` is on the menu once `ggplot2` is in a more complete form, so I'd hoped that `ggplot2` would adopt "%>%" pipes, rather than "+" for composing plots.
It would be convenient to adopt one mental model that would be more easily transferable between the two, as well as `ddplyr`, `tidyr`, etc.
- huac 10y agoIt doesn't make sense to use `%>%` in plots IMO because that implies you're going to wrap the lhs in the function denoted in the rhs (as the pipe is treated in dplyr/magrittr).
- rz2k 10y agoTake a look at the ggvis syntax here: http://ggvis.rstudio.com/ggvis-basics.html http://ggvis.rstudio.com/ggvis-basics.html
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]