3 ms·
Do you have that backwards? Conventional wisdom is the opposite so if you're correct this is actually quite interesting.
by danteembermage 17y ago
Do you have that backwards? Conventional wisdom is the opposite so if you're correct this is actually quite interesting.
- enjo 17y agoEverything I've read is somewhere in the middle. Higher weight (85% of max) at 8-12 reps is the sweet spot for hypertrophy. I've seen that in lots of different places.
- keefe 17y agohttp://www.mayoclinic.com/health/strength-training/AN00893 http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/strength-training/AN00893 Agree. Also, experimentally verified.
- earl 17y agoActually, I don't think that's true -- most, if not all, studies are performed on untrained subjects. It is not at all established that methods that work for the first 6 months work the same at 5+ years.
- keefe 17y agohow about worry about 5 years after 6 months, it's a much easier routine.
- scott_s 17y agoKeep in mind that if you want significant hypertrophy, you have to continually increase the weight, even if you're doing "high rep." Bodybuilders typically do more high-rep workouts than, say, a powerlifter. But their loads on high-rep workouts are still significantly more than an average person. Personally, when I strength train, I mix it up between high-rep days (10 or more reps with a moderate weight, usually 4 sets), medium days (5 sets of 5 reps with loads that range from 70% to 90% of my max) and heavy days (7-10 reps of singles at higher than 90% of max). The hardest days, mentally and physically, are the high-rep days because it taxes my conditioning just as much as my strength.
- matrix 17y agoI should have qualified that: by "high rep" I meant in the 10 - 12 rep range, as opposed to, say 5 reps. It's true that some training protocols call for much higher reps, but those are not typical. The appropriate references supporting this can be found in "Practical Programming for Strength Training" by Rippetoe, amongst other resources.