3 ms·
The way I read it is that each question is independent. So I can say I've used Angular and would never use it again while also saying I've used React and would
by morgante 10y ago
The way I read it is that each question is independent.
So I can say I've used Angular and would never use it again while also saying I've used React and would use it again.
This is really a pretty decisively positive stat for React. Very few of its users would never use it again, while a lot of people have tried Angular and abandoned it. (This certainly matches my experience and anecdotes I've heard in the community.)
- cloverich 10y ago> The way I read it is that each question is independent. Mine as well. I have two active work projects -- one is React, and one is plain Javascript. The latter is to keep the project extremely lean (mobile form single time use type thing) and I've enjoyed using no libraries in it (yet). So I would have responded positively to both of those questions.
- Roboprog 10y agoI know. I was joking about a coincidence, as well as pointing out some of the largest response groups. The "tried X and would do it again" add up to over 100%, so some people had more than one tool for favored for different situations (or at least tolerated employer specified selections) That said, it looks like React is doing well, and I bet on the wrong horse :-(