4 ms·
However, implying that "anti-glare" is better makes it easier to justify charging an extra $50 (for something that used to come standard on all devices... grr).
by jcl 17y ago
However, implying that "anti-glare" is better makes it easier to justify charging an extra $50 (for something that used to come standard on all devices... grr).
- astrodust 17y agoI like how they charge $50 extra for what is essentially removing the plastic screen protector cover that causes all the "glare" in the first place. A "matte" MacBook Pro has an exposed screen, no black border where the plastic cover is mounted, and looks almost perversely naked.