Yeah, this post seems to be addressing an annoying conversational experience, but ignores the other side: the reality, which you describe. I understand that jus

Yeah, this post seems to be addressing an annoying conversational experience, but ignores the other side: the reality, which you describe. I understand that just scaling out their platform is a ton of work that justifies having a lot of engineers. But how does Twitter have so many engineers on staff and yet their users constantly complain that they don't improve even seemingly low hanging fruit? Is ~1,500 people not enough? Is there some lingering technical debt they're dealing with? Or is it just people accumulated over time they value too much to let go?