3 ms·
I just want to point out nationalization/existing public services also increase inequality in quite similar ways. 1. Traffic fines are still public. Still regr
by qwrusz 10y ago
I just want to point out nationalization/existing public services also increase inequality in quite similar ways.
1. Traffic fines are still public. Still regressive.
2. Social Security is still public and still has a cap on taxes for > 6 figure incomes.
3. Wage cuts (granted I think this gets worse when privatized) and benefits cuts are dealt to public employees all the time. Look at the many underfunded local pensions/city budgets and how they've chosen to respond.
4. Private interests into parks and charters schools etc. This also happens to be an opportunity to give extra attention to the needs of poor individuals and families, and people of color. There is a debate ongoing, but many charter schools in poor neighborhoods have better funding/facilities than a would-be public school there. This is not close to perfect or a panacea, but it has potential, attacking charter schools without nuanced research is imprudent.
This is a controversial topic. I am not taking sides. There are many complex/taboo issues and few working solutions so far. Glad it is being discussed.
- zip1234 10y ago2. Social Security has a cap on tax because there is a cap on the payout. Edit: that said, this does increase inequality because the money put into Social Security does very poorly compared to private sector investing. The six figure salary person can instead invest in something better than social security.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- tomp 10y agoRe: 1. Traffic fines are progressive in Switzerland (or at least not regressive), because they're issued as percentage of income.