3 ms·
Hey, thats a great idea. Have you thought about facilitating an interaction between the person with the service and the other party so that it is quite clear t
by stretchwithme 17y ago
Hey, thats a great idea.
Have you thought about facilitating an interaction between the person with the service and the other party so that it is quite clear that someone will be notified if something happens to them? I'd think deterrent is more than half the benefit of something like this.
- pxlpshr 17y agoIf an alert goes out on your behalf then you are CCed (SMS/email/push) that an alert was triggered. We also have some plans to allow responders to communicate back to you that they've received the alert and are taking action. We'll probably roll this out in the next 30 days or so.
- stretchwithme 17y agoI guess what I'm talking about is the craig's list or blind date situation mentioned in the Techcrunch article. Can your service help prevent something bad from happening by making the other party aware that you use the service?
- pxlpshr 17y agoAside from you informing that person, I can't think of another way off the top of my head but I'll give it some thought. I do think that it could deter a potential issue if you communicated the basis of the service in regard to GPS breadcrumb and the alert if you don't checkin. The Natalie Holloway case comes to mind.