3 ms·

I did that, and, it seems that although it fails some virus scanners, it would be what I like to call a false positive. Just to link a description of what one

I did that, and, it seems that although it fails some virus scanners, it would be what I like to call a false positive. Just to link a description of what one of them found: https://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2014-071815-0057-99&tabid=2 https://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid... Basically it could be an unwanted application that "The application reports an exaggerated number of problems." Shitty software? Sure. Malware? Not to me. YMMV. Here's a screen shot of the ones it failed from that total scanner: https://i.imgur.com/vwy9sXY.jpg https://i.imgur.com/vwy9sXY.jpg

deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
59nadir 10y ago
It's funny that you mention axes to grind (hidden motives). It's exactly what I think when I read the apologist threads/posts like yours. To look at obviously shady behavior and start giving excuses for it just reeks of misguided fanboyism. If this were a bigger entity I'd assume you were all corporate astroturfers.
- posterboy 10y ago
  Is that the old switcheroo you playing? No need to answer.
- sctb 10y ago
  This is a disproportionate and unfair response, but whatever it is that our fellow users say, we don't make insulting accusations like “... reeks of misguided fanboyism.” Please don't comment like this here.