3 ms·
What is the relevance to this discussion? Are you actually asserting that the facts raised there are false, or are you simply trying to get people to dismiss tr
by yummyfajitas 10y ago
What is the relevance to this discussion? Are you actually asserting that the facts raised there are false, or are you simply trying to get people to dismiss true statements?
- Inufu 10y agoThere's a good chance that anything on RT is either false or presented in a very misleading way - they are a propaganda outfit for the Kremlin after all. See eg. http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/09/daily-chart-4 http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/09/daily-c... or http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/putin-fights-war-of-images-and-propaganda-with-russia-today-channel-a-916162.html http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/putin-fights-wa...
- yummyfajitas 10y agotl;dr; you want people to think the facts presented are false but you have no actual argument against them. Is wikipedia also Russian propaganda?
- lrem 10y agoHow is Wikipedia protected from state actors biasing the content?
- Symbiote 10y agoBoth sources have such low credibility that they should be ignored. That doesn't mean they're wrong, but I don't think they lend any weight to your argument.