3 ms·
> Hell, if you really care about privacy, you should not take any (digital) photos at all[1]. > [1] - That's "NSA paranoia"-level privacy, but for some people
by JadeNB 10y ago
> Hell, if you really care about privacy, you should not take any (digital) photos at all[1].
> [1] - That's "NSA paranoia"-level privacy, but for some people it can be a realistic threat model.
Assuming you do use a digital camera (so there is no developer involved), and your camera is not wireless enabled (so that the only way to disseminate the photos is for you to elect to do it), what is the threat model here?
- TeMPOraL 10y agoYay, you're right, I forgot that those even exist. I think older digital cameras may be safe. That said, it's very much a corner case - after all, a typical person will eventually plug the camera to the computer for viewing or archiving purposes.
- JadeNB 10y ago> That said, it's very much a corner case - after all, a typical person will eventually plug the camera to the computer for viewing or archiving purposes. Sorry; in fact that's what I meant to ask. Is a wired connection to a non-networked computer from a non-wireless enabled digital camera safe, or is there some non-obvious threat even there?