4 ms·
To clarify: There are two writing speeds of an SSD, one when the block is empty and one when the block already has data, the latter is slower and TRIM support f
by sorbits 16y ago
To clarify: There are two writing speeds of an SSD, one when the block is empty and one when the block already has data, the latter is slower and TRIM support from the OS will allow the SSD to know about “dead data” so that it can reorganize data to optimize free blocks.
I am using the first generation Intel SSD which doesn’t actually support such reorganization and isn’t noticeable affected by “being full” (as opposed to writing to the factory default empty state).
I am also using Crucial SSD (with OS X) and that as well is magnitudes faster than my previous mechanical disk.
So all in all, this degraded performance is blown a bit out of proportion and you are doing yourself a great disservice by holding out for TRIM support — to echo others: SSD was the best upgrade I added to my system.
Edit: I am btw using SSDs with a desktop system. So I compare them with my previous 7200 RPM drives. For a laptop there is absolutely no doubt that you should go with an SSD (if you can afford it), TRIM support or not. For a desktop, I would still highly recommend it.
- 9oliYQjP 16y agoI totally agree if it's a choice between somewhat decent SSD (e.g., I'd probably avoid the Samsungs that Apple actually offers) or hard disk, go for SSD. I'm just disappointed that Apple hasn't yet enabled TRIM support. They apparently laid the groundwork for it in the kernel but haven't actually finished off the work. Every time they roll out new models, I check to see if they've actually enabled TRIM support in a point update of OS X but they haven't. They'll eventually have to as it's being rolled into the ATA specification.