4 ms·
For those curious as to why performance will degrade quicker on OS X: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM Just had to look tha
by generalk 17y ago
For those curious as to why performance will degrade quicker on OS X:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM
Just had to look that up myself. Shocking that OS X doesn't support it natively, although the article suggests there may be utilities that can replace that functionality.
- enterneo 17y agoIntel X-25M has TRIM support in the controller itself, and thats the way it should be I believe
- sorbits 17y agoThe drive does not know when data stored on the drive is “deleted”. This is what TRIM is for, i.e. when you delete a file you just unlink the inode. You need to tell the drive that the blocks that the file occupied are no longer needed, so the disk can ignore that data when reorganizing or later rewriting part of the block.
- 9oliYQjP 17y agoUnfortunately while there are strategies to mitigate the problem in hardware, proper TRIM support is still best. You might be getting confused by the TRIM enabled firmware that was released in December '09 for that SSD? It just means that the Intel drive will obey TRIM commands from the OS. But if the OS doesn't send any commands, which OS X won't, then you're not taking advantage of TRIM. For what it's worth, if you were going to choose a drive that would degrade the least in performance without the use of TRIM, you probably chose best with the Intel X-25M. But it would still perform better over time in Linux or Windows 7.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- dedward 17y agoDeleted my previous ignorant comment - I had it backwards. The idea behind TRIM is so the OS can tell the drive when a block is free, so the SSD can pro-actively erase it, which is something that otherwise slows down the write cycle if you are writing to a block that wasn't already clean. That's not something you can just magic into a drive.....