That would be nice, but I don’t see how it would end well. Their value is based on the intrinsic scarcity of homes in desirable locations. For existing land ow

That would be nice, but I don’t see how it would end well. Their value is based on the intrinsic scarcity of homes in desirable locations. For existing land owners, either they sell out to developers and allow the land to realize its economic value, or they keep the land the same and eventually the bubble subsides. For various reasons, they tend to fight to keep the existing neighborhood character, which restricts the growth of the economy. So, when the bubble collapses, the homes will be worth less. This will suck for people who bought a $40,000 home, that went up to $1,000,000 and then back down to something still more than $40,000. It will suck a lot for people who bought it at $1,000,000 and will lose all their home equity. I think the proper solution would be to evolve the neighborhood over time, as the economy changes. The problem with that is you would have to start 60 years ago. As it is, we have small areas of market activity, and large areas of externally ossified neighborhoods that are internally gentrifying because the stuff on top of the land is not allowed to adapt to the economy.