4 ms·

Ahead-of-Time Compilation in Angular 2

• deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]
• finchisko 10y ago
  Angular guys are perfect in giving features like template compilation cool names like AOT to make buzz. But actually most FW has AOT already then. Nothing special to be excited about. Don't stick to their glue just because of this and remember how terrible they failed with 1.x.
  • k__ 10y ago
    I didn't stick to ng2 because it felt overloaded with concepts, also writing it felt kinda awkward, coming from stuff like Ember and React.
  • DSteinmann 10y ago
    I doubt any competent developers are even considering Angular for new projects. Not just because of 1.x but because it's not a relevant technology anymore. Everywhere I look cyclic data is the way forward. Using Angular now is like using Backbone in 2014.
• robertknight 10y ago
  > But actually most FW has AOT already then. I'm not sure about "most", its relatively new amongst currently popular frameworks. Assuming I understand correctly that the script execution time figures he provides are for the angular-seed app, what _is_ insane is how much time is spend executing JavaScript for what is a very simple application. By having a framework which is very large and contains a lot of code in the first place, you then have a lot of work to do to try and recover from that volume.