4 ms·
Seems like another flavor of the month authentication schema that won't catch on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQRL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQRL I think
by zerognowl 10y ago
Seems like another flavor of the month authentication schema that won't catch on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQRL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQRL
I think we need to work within the existing schema of passwords because that's what people are used to. They have muscle memory for entering passwords that is very hard to wipe. They have entire ecosystems based around passwords-for-profit (1password, Lastpass, and any number of 2FA solutions).
I think the general consensus now is that passwords only serve the threat model behind them. If I use a sixteen character password with at least 3 emojis, numbers, and no dictionary words for storing 4chan memes on Imgur, then something is desperately wrong with my threat model.
Likewise if I'm using a six letter alphanumeric password to get access to my email account (which might be tied to all my other accounts), then there's something awry with my threat model.
SQRL on the other hand could serve other threat models and seems useful for quick-and-dirty interaction with the Internet. If I want to leave a single anonymous comment for example, on Hackernews/Reddit, I shouldn't have to do the password dance each time.