4 ms·
That isn't the case being made: "men become targets of similar harassment campaigns" was the case. Not "men become targets of similar harassment campaigns b
by Normal_gaussian 10y ago
That isn't the case being made:
"men become targets of similar harassment campaigns"
was the case.
Not
"men become targets of similar harassment campaigns because of their gender"
If you want to qualify away from beliefs towards physical properties then fine. Lets turn around and look at those harassed for their hair colour. How about skin colour? Origin? Things other members of their family have done?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- tedunangst 10y agoIf one person is targeted because of their gender and one person is targeted because of their beliefs, I would qualify those situations as dissimilar.
- Normal_gaussian 10y agoI said: > If you want to qualify away from beliefs towards physical properties then fine. Lets turn around and look at those harassed for their hair colour. How about skin colour? Origin? Things other members of their family have done? I do not understand why this is not sufficient to preempt your comment. In case it is not here are some example I have found alongside their google search terms: * "Ginger driven to suicide" http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2507153/Bullied-ginger-Wolverhampton-schoolboy-Simon-Walters-14-hanged.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2507153/Bullied-ging... * "footballer harassed racial" https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2013/may/13/racism-mario-balotelli-kevin-prince-boateng-italy https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2013/may/13/racism... * "father harassed by" http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-28/sandy-hook-massacre-victims-parents-harassed-by-truthers/7546536 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-28/sandy-hook-massacre-vi...