> We'd be better off following the trail of breadcrumbs back to the source I'm thinking this is what was intended. Did something get lost along the way with a

> We'd be better off following the trail of breadcrumbs back to the source I'm thinking this is what was intended. Did something get lost along the way with all the layers of translation from "human problem" to machine language? Here's another quote from the source passage, linked elsewhere in this thread: The sequence of operations will be too difficult to decipher unless you have access to the source code from which the instructions were compiled. University researchers who wish to carry out such an experiment would probably have to sign nondisclosure agreements in order to get a look at the relevant source code.