I didn't mean to imply monitor. I meant to say keep a history and mediate. AKA, if you have a message board and someone says something offensive you can get r

I didn't mean to imply monitor. I meant to say keep a history and mediate. AKA, if you have a message board and someone says something offensive you can get rid of that user. Monitor to me implies mitigating users based on ML, history/mediate requires human intervention. I don't think this is a good idea personally but it is an idea, only you can decide to lock down your content like that. No I don't stand by it. It's an option, they asked for options. This is a bad one, but it depends on how serious they are about protecting their authors.